Log in or register
Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 12 MARCH 2020

Online Intermediation Services – Fairness And Transparency For Business Users

A. Karitzis & Associates L.L.C
Explore more from A. Karitzis & Associates L.L.C

Online intermediation services can be considered key to business models, trade and innovation, which can improve consumer welfare, and which can be used by both private and public sectors.

CyprusLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
A. Karitzis & Associates L.L.C
A. Karitzis & Associates L.L.C
Author LinkedIn connections

Online intermediation services can be considered key to business models, trade and innovation, which can improve consumer welfare, and which can be used by both private and public sectors. The European Union (EU) has published a regulation (Regulation (EU) 2019/1150)1 so as to enable the monitoring of online intermediation services and to potentially secure consumers from threats that appear. Ultimately, the aim is to enable the Union to achieve a fair and transparent treatment for the business users who use online platforms, giving them more effective options for redress when facing potential difficulties, creating a more predictable and regulatory environment for online platforms within the EU.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

Register for freeORLog in

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

View source

Related Articles

Legal Intelligence Newsletters: sign up for the latest legal and regulatory news on your chosen topics

Read more about

Related Comparative Guides

See more popular content from

Article

Jurisdiction In Cross-border Litigation: Insights From A Recent Cyprus Court Decision

It is not uncommon for high-value commercial disputes to give rise to jurisdictional issues, particularly where they involve multiple defendants domiciled in different jurisdictions or where one or more parties have entered into agreements containing jurisdiction clauses. The reason is straightforward: if the Court determines that it lacks jurisdiction to hear the matter, the proceedings may effectively come to an end at the outset. Accordingly, the issue of jurisdiction must be determined by the Court as a preliminary matter and at the earliest stage of proceedings.
CyprusLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Elias Neocleous & Co LLC
Elias Neocleous & Co LLC
Article

The Preliminary Reference Procedure Before The CJEU: Cyprus Jurisprudence

The mechanism of the preliminary reference stands as one of the cornerstones of European Union law. It establishes a channel of judicial cooperation between the national courts of Member States and the Court of Justice of the European Union ("CJEU"), ensuring the uniform interpretation and application of EU law across all Member States. Understanding this mechanism, and in particular the conditions under which a Cypriot court may invoke it, is of considerable practical importance for any party appearing in proceedings that raise a question of EU law.
CyprusLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Elias Neocleous & Co LLC
Elias Neocleous & Co LLC
Article

Landmark Judgment in Civil Appeal 31/2017: Cyprus' Duty to Investigate the Fate of Missing Persons under the ECHR

The Supreme Court of Cyprus has issued a landmark ruling establishing that the state's obligation to investigate missing persons from the 1974 Turkish invasion is triggered automatically by disappearance under suspicious circumstances, regardless of whether remains have been located. The judgment clarifies that humanitarian efforts through the Committee on Missing Persons do not substitute for the required criminal investigation, and that neither political considerations nor practical difficulties justify f
CyprusLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
George Z. Georgiou & Associates LLC
George Z. Georgiou & Associates LLC