Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 01 AUGUST 2014

Supreme Court: Conditionally Allowing Patentee To Correct Claim Drafting Errors

Lifang & Partners
Lifang & Partners
Contributor
Lifang & Partners

Lifang & Partners

About Lifang & Partners: Founded in 2002, Lifang & Partners is a full-service law firm with offices...

View firm profile
Explore more from Lifang & Partners

It is possible that a few drafting errors still exist in a granted claim due to drafting or examination carelessness, which may cause interested parties to understand the claim controversially in a post-grant proceeding.

ChinaIntellectual Property
Xi Sun
Xi Sun

[Abstract]

It is possible that a few drafting errors still exist in a granted claim due to drafting or examination carelessness, which may cause interested parties to understand the claim controversially in a post-grant proceeding. A recent Supreme Court decision shows that correction of the drafting errors can be allowed with conditions:

If a claim phrase in an invention or utility model patent is obviously wrong in expression, but people skilled in the art can find its unique correct explanation clearly, directly and without any doubt in accordance with the disclosure of its specification, the explanation can be used to define the claim's scope.

Patent Invalidation Dispute on "A Precise Rotation Compensator"

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from