Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 15 JULY 2026

Supreme Court: After First-Instance Infringement Finding, Preliminary Injunction Generally Should Be Maintained

The Supreme People's Court has issued landmark rulings in two patent infringement cases that establish a crucial legal standard for preliminary injunctions issued alongside first-instance judgments. These decisions clarify when and how courts should maintain injunctive relief during the reconsideration stage, particularly when substantive hearings have already established infringement.

ChinaIntellectual Property

The Supreme People's Court has issued rulings in two cases concerning applications for reconsideration of preliminary injunctions in patent infringement disputes, clarifying an important legal standard:

When a court, after trial, issues both a first-instance judgment ordering the defendant to cease infringement and a preliminary injunction ordering immediate cessation of the infringing acts, the factual and legal basis for the injunction is relatively strong because the case has already been subject to substantive hearings. At the reconsideration stage, the preliminary injunction should generally be maintained unless the respondent provides countervailing evidence or sufficiently strong reasons demonstrating that the conditions for granting the injunction are not met.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from