Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 16 JANUARY 2023

Priority Date As The Important Role From The Opposition Case

When conducting the trademark monitor, we are surprised that a trademark which is same (almost identical) with the prior registered mark over the similar goods is published on the trademark...

ChinaIntellectual Property

When conducting the trademark monitor, we are surprised that a trademark which is same (almost identical) with the prior registered mark over the similar goods is published on the trademark Gazette for opposition. The owner of the prior registered trademark may ask "why the official did not bar the application of the detected mark by citing my prior same (almost identical) trademark over the same designated goods?" We will help you to clarify this question by reviewing an old case.

Abstract

Our part, acting on behalf of the client, filed trademark opposition against the trademark No. 12366576 for "DOPE" (as the opposed mark). After examination, the CNIPA hold that the opposed mark shall not be approved for registration.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from