Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 24 APRIL 2026

Latest Judicial Practice On "Significant Difference" For Chinese Design Patents

Chang Tsi & Partners
Chang Tsi & Partners
Contributor
Chang Tsi & Partners

Chang Tsi & Partners

Chang Tsi & Partners is a "National Outstanding Law Firm (nominated by Ministry of Justice of...

View firm profile
Explore more from Chang Tsi & Partners

Since the revision of the Patent Examination Guidelines in 2023, the China National Intellectual Property Administration (CNIPA) has strengthened its preliminary examination of design patents...

ChinaIntellectual Property

I. Background

Since the revision of the Patent Examination Guidelines in 2023, the China National Intellectual Property Administration (CNIPA) has strengthened its preliminary examination of design patents by adding a more stringent review of whether, “compared with an existing design or a combination of existing designs, the claimed design shall have a significant difference.” The examination standard has clearly become stricter.

In invalidation proceedings for design patents, the lack of a “significant difference” has long been one of the main grounds for invalidation since the implementation of the third amendment to the Patent Law of the P.R.C in 2009. How to determine “significant difference” is directly related to the stability of patent rights.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from