Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 04 NOVEMBER 2021

Market Intelligence Thought Leadership Award Winner

Beijing IP Court Issues Fines Over Fake Evidence

We summarize and review the cases.

ChinaIntellectual Property

On 10 September, the Beijing IP Court released six typical cases where it punished the relevant litigant participants and cancelled six trademarks for fake evidence in lawsuits against non-use cancellation appeal decisions. We summarize and review the cases.

Case 1: Fabricating test reports and advertisement registration certificates, etc. (Jingzhixingchu 2015-1165)

In the non-use cancellation case relating to the trademark JIAJIA and its Chinese characters and Device, No. 1486278, the third parties with surnames Li and Bai submitted test reports and business licenses, but the trademarks in the copy and the original were inconsistent.

The third parties also submitted advertisement registration certificates in notarized form to prove that the copy was consistent with the original. However, the dates on the certificate were inconsistent and 29 February 2013 was not a date at all. The goods descriptions on the copy and original invoices were inconsistent, too.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from