Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 18 MAY 2026

2025 Typical Cases of Trademark Administrative Protection

China's National Intellectual Property Administration has released ten significant trademark enforcement cases from 2024, showcasing coordinated efforts between administrative and criminal authorities to combat infringement. These cases span various industries and demonstrate innovative enforcement approaches, from tackling bad faith filings of emerging AI brand names to dismantling cross-regional counterfeit networks through online and offline channels.

ChinaIntellectual Property

1. Series of Bad Faith Fillings of the DEEPSEEK Trademark, Guangdong

This case involved brand protection for a technology company in an emerging field of innovation. The CNIPA rejected the bad faith trademark applications and issued a public notice. Authorities at the provincial, city, and district levels responded quickly, cracking down on the practice of piggybacking on popular terms and supporting the development of the artificial intelligence industry.

2. Use of a Deceptive 1788134a.jpg Mark as a Trademark, Chongqing

This case involved the continued illegal use of a registered trademark after it had been declared invalid because it was deceptive. The authorities investigated and severely punished the illegal use, effectively cleaning up the market and guiding businesses toward lawful and proper trademark use

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from