Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 11 SEPTEMBER 2026

Artificial Intelligence In Public Decision-making: Guidelines, Jurisprudence And Open Questions

Gowling WLG
Gowling WLG
Contributor
Gowling WLG

Gowling WLG

The firm The firm’s lawyers speak English, French, Russian and Ukrainian. The firm’s client base...

View firm profile
Explore more from Gowling WLG

Canadian public authorities and courts are increasingly integrating artificial intelligence tools into their decision-making processes, raising critical questions about procedural fairness and the proper role of human judgment. This comprehensive analysis examines the evolving guidelines from Canadian judicial bodies and governments, explores key lessons from emerging case law, and identifies unresolved legal questions about AI's appropriate use in administrative and judicial contexts.

CanadaTechnology

Like many of us, Canadian public authorities and courts are increasingly using artificial intelligence (“AI”) tools in their day-to-day work. While AI tools may provide welcome administrative efficiencies, their use by decision-makers raises important concerns. The most pressing are (i) ensuring that the decision-makers—and not the AI tools—are grappling with the substance of, and ultimately deciding, the matters before them; and (ii) ensuring that the resulting decisions are procedurally fair to those they affect.

Many Canadian decision-makers are, laudably, working through these concerns in public. This article summarizes the current, public guidelines issued by Canadian courts and governments on the use of AI in administrative and judicial decision-making. It then identifies a number of lessons from the evolving case law on the use of AI and raises some important open questions.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from