Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 13 SEPTEMBER 2017

Supreme Court Justices Drop The Gloves Over Tariff Classification

McMillan LLP
McMillan LLP
Contributor
McMillan LLP

McMillan LLP

The firm : McMillan LLP is one of Canada’s leading national law firms with offices in Montreal,...

View firm profile
Explore more from McMillan LLP

In Canada (Attorney General) v. Igloo Vikski Inc. the Supreme Court of Canada had its first opportunity to consider the appropriate tariff classification of imported goods under the harmonized system...

CanadaTax

In wintertime ice hockey is the delight of everyone.

Opening words of the majority decision of the Supreme Court of Canada in Igloo Vikski40

Canada (Attorney General) v. Igloo Vikski Inc.
2016 sec 38

INTRODUCTION

In Canada (Attorney General) v. Igloo Vikski Inc.41 the Supreme Court of Canada had its first opportunity to consider the appropriate tariff classification of imported goods under the harmonized system schedule ("the HS schedule") to the Customs Tariff.42 Although it is a given that tax legislation is complex and difficult to interpret, the HS schedule is particularly opaque, perhaps because it reflects the input and wide-ranging interests of more than 180 members of the World Customs Organization (WCO). The Igloo Vikski case delves deeply into those complex interpretive rules of tariff classification and provides guidelines on how to apply them.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from