Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 24 JANUARY 2020

Rectification Is Back—Is Rescission Next?

In 5551928 Manitoba Ltd. (Re) (2018 BCSC 1482; aff'd 2019 BCCA 376; herein referred to as "Manitoba"), the court allowed a claim for an order rectifying a directors' resolution.

CanadaTax

In 5551928 Manitoba Ltd. (Re) (2018 BCSC 1482; aff'd 2019 BCCA 376; herein referred to as "Manitoba"), the court allowed a claim for an order rectifying a directors' resolution declaring a dividend from the capital dividend account (CDA) of a private corporation. On October 30, 2019, the BCCA dismissed the attorney general's appeal. (For additional background on the lower court's decision and other recent decisions involving rectification, see "Rectification: Where Are We Now?" Canadian Tax Focus, May 2019.)

The BCSC's Decision in Manitoba

The attorney general appealed the BCSC's decision in Manitoba on the following grounds:

  • the BCSC misapplied the test for rectification by focusing on "intention as to [the] tax consequences" of the resolution rather than on whether it correctly recorded the unilateral act that the directors resolved to undertake; and

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from