Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 19 MAY 2009

Loan Restructuring Triggers GAAR

Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
Contributor
Borden Ladner Gervais LLP

Borden Ladner Gervais LLP

With over 750 lawyers, intellectual property agents and other professionals, BLG services...

View firm profile
Explore more from Borden Ladner Gervais LLP

On April 29, 2009, the Tax Court of Canada held in “Lehigh Cement Limited v. The Queen” that the general anti-avoidance rule (“GAAR”) applied to a series of transactions which resulted in interest payments by Lehigh on debt held by a related non-resident corporation being restructured as interest payments to an arm’s length non-resident bank in order to access the former “5/25” domestic withholding tax exemption for interest on certain arm’s length corporate debt.

CanadaTax

On April 29, 2009, the Tax Court of Canada held in Lehigh Cement Limited v. The Queen that the general anti-avoidance rule ("GAAR") applied to a series of transactions which resulted in interest payments by Lehigh on debt held by a related non-resident corporation being restructured as interest payments to an arm's length non-resident bank in order to access the former "5/25" domestic withholding tax exemption for interest on certain arm's length corporate debt.

Although the 5/25 exemption was replaced in 2008 with a much broader withholding tax exemption for most arm's length interest payments, Lehigh is interesting in that it takes a similar approach to the Lipson and Landrus cases decided earlier this year in which the courts focused on the object, spirit and purpose of the relevant statutory provisions and the "overall results" of a series of transactions in determining whether those transactions were abusive for purposes of the GAAR. The trial judge also

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from