Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 07 JULY 2020

FCA Refuses To Pierce The Corporate Veil In Cameco Transfer Pricing Case

Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
Contributor
Borden Ladner Gervais LLP

Borden Ladner Gervais LLP

With over 750 lawyers, intellectual property agents and other professionals, BLG services...

View firm profile
Explore more from Borden Ladner Gervais LLP

On June 26, 2020, the Federal Court of Appeal (FCA) issued a unanimous decision upholding the decision of the Tax Court of Canada in Cameco Corporation v The Queen.

CanadaTax

On June 26, 2020, the Federal Court of Appeal (FCA) issued a unanimous decision1 upholding the decision of the Tax Court of Canada in Cameco Corporation v The Queen.2 The case provides additional clarity with respect to the application of Canada's transfer pricing rules found in section 247 of the Income Tax Act (Canada) (the Tax Act),3 which govern transactions between Canadian residents and non-arm's length non-residents of Canada.4

What you need to know

The FCA unanimously rejected an attempt by the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) to use the transfer pricing rules to pierce the corporate veil and disregard taxpayers' true legal relationships.

The purpose of Canada's transfer pricing rules is to ensure that transactions between non-arm's length parties are conducted on arm's length terms and conditions.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from