Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 07 FEBRUARY 2020

FCA Confirms That An Inducement Is Taxable As A Restrictive Covenant Payment

Bennett Jones LLP
Bennett Jones LLP
Contributor
Bennett Jones LLP

Bennett Jones LLP

Bennett Jones is one of Canada’s premier business law firms. With deep experience in complex...

View firm profile
Explore more from Bennett Jones LLP

The Federal Court of Appeal has upheld the decision of the Tax Court of Canada (2018 TCC 158, Smith J.), confirming that a payment made to induce a party to sign a share purchase agreement

CanadaTax

The Federal Court of Appeal has upheld the decision of the Tax Court of Canada (2018 TCC 158, Smith J.), confirming that a payment made to induce a party to sign a share purchase agreement was subject to withholding tax under Part XIII of the Income Tax Act (Canada). If structured differently, the payment might have escaped the Canadian tax net.

Facts

Pangaea was one of three shareholders of Public Mobile Holdings Inc. ("Public") and party to a unanimous shareholders' agreement that prohibited the other Public shareholders from selling their shares without Pangaea's consent.

Telus Communications offered to buy Public in 2013 and Thomvest, one of the other Public shareholders paid Pangaea $3 million pursuant to a letter agreement under which Pangaea agreed to execute a share purchase agreement with Telus.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from