Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 19 JUNE 2026

Directors’ Liability For Unremitted GST/HS

Directors of corporations that fail to remit GST/HST may face personal liability for corporate tax debts, but statutory limitation rules create narrow windows for enforcement. The recent Stevens v. The King case demonstrates how courts scrutinize resignation claims and what evidence directors must provide to escape liability under Canada's Excise Tax Act framework.

CanadaTax

Download a PDF copy of this Blog here.

The GST/HST framework under the Excise Tax Act (“ETA”), as with other indirect tax regimes (like federal and provincial alcohol, tobacco and vaping taxes) includes “directors’ liability” provisions that are triggered when the corporation does not have the money to pay an assessed amount. Most of these systems have “statutory limitation rules” and “due diligence defences” which may limit liability, but these rules are extremely tricky to apply in practice.

We review these in a two-part series here, with reference to the helpful recent case Stevens v. The King, 2026 TCC 76 (“Stevens”), which revolves around this directors’ liability framework.

This Report concerns the “statutory limitation rules”. For our companion Report on the “due diligence defence”, click here.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from