Last December we discussed from a Canadian perspective the final
reports1 issued by the OECD on the 15 action items in
its base erosion and profitshifting project.2
We expressed the view that Canada is unlikely to adopt —
at least in the near term — any of the OECD's substantive
recommendations, except those in relation to action 6 (treaty
abuse), but we foresaw the adoption of several of the BEPS
procedural recommendations. Those predictions have been borne out
by the March 22 budget from Canada's new Liberal Party federal
government, also containing an unexpected extension of the 2014
anti-back-to-back financing rules, which could be seen to be
inspired by the BEPS project. The budget also, unusually,
encourages the Canada Revenue Agency to employ most of the action
8-10 recommendations on transfer pricing, even though the Supreme
Court made clear in its 2012 decision in Glaxo that the
OECD transfer pricing guidelines do not, per se, make law in
Canada.3