Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 15 SEPTEMBER 2004

Recent Québec Pension Cases With Potential Cross-Canada Impact

Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP
Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP
Contributor
Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

As one of Canada’s top business law firms, Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP (Blakes) provides...

View firm profile
Explore more from Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

As in its politics and culture, Québec is a "distinct society" when it comes to the administration of pension plans. Its <I>Supplemental Pension Plans Act</I>(SPPA) includes many requirements that do not exist in other jurisdictions. That said, the basic principles for administering pension plans are quite similar to those in the rest of Canada and, therefore, some recent Québec cases could have cross-country impact.

CanadaStrategy

This article was originally published in Blakes Bulletin on Pensions & Employee Benefits-August 2004

As in its politics and culture, Québec is a "distinct society" when it comes to the administration of pension plans. Its Supplemental Pension Plans Act(SPPA) includes many requirements that do not exist in other jurisdictions. That said, the basic principles for administering pension plans are quite similar to those in the rest of Canada and, therefore, some recent Québec cases could have cross-country impact.

Retirees’ Rights: The Hydro-Québec Case

The pension plan community is awaiting a Québec Court of Appeal ruling in a high-profile dispute over the obligations of pension plan administrators and pension committees to act in an even-handed manner when the interests of different classes of participants and beneficiaries are in conflict. In Association provinciale des retraités d’Hydro-Québec v. Hydro-Québec, a group of retirees alleges Hydro-Québec, as trustee of the pension plan,

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from