Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 27 JULY 2004

Case Law And Regulatory Update -Pensions & Benefits

Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP
Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP
Contributor
Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

As one of Canada’s top business law firms, Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP (Blakes) provides...

View firm profile
Explore more from Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

In recent months, there have been numerous rulings, regulatory actions and ongoing proceedings of great interest to pension plans in the courts and before the Financial Services Tribunal. There have also been some discussion and consultation papers of note.

CanadaStrategy

This article was first published in Blakes Bulletin on Pension & Benefits - January 2004

In recent months, there have been numerous rulings, regulatory actions and ongoing proceedings of great interest to pension plans in the courts and before the Financial Services Tribunal. There have also been some discussion and consultation papers of note.

The ongoing case of Monsanto Canada Inc. v. Superintendent of Financial Services will be heard by the Supreme Court of Canada in February, 2004. The Ontario Court of Appeal had affirmed an earlier decision by a lower court that supported the Superintendent’s position under the Pension Benefits Act that surplus assets in a pension plan’s partial wind-up must be distributed at the time of the wind-up. Recently, OSFI has sought intervenor status in support of Monsanto’ s position.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from