Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 12 MARCH 2010

A New Threat For Structured Finance Transactions: Flip Clauses Enforceable?

A recent U.S. bankruptcy case has challenged the enforceability of a common structured finance provision and exposed many highly rated transactions to the risk of downgrade and default.

CanadaStrategy

A recent U.S. bankruptcy case has challenged the enforceability of a common structured finance provision and exposed many highly rated transactions to the risk of downgrade and default.

In many structured finance transactions, investors acquire notes of a special purpose issuer secured by or linked to specific assets or collateral. Often the issuer will enter into a swap to hedge interest rate or currency risks or to assume additional credit risk and generate additional returns. In most transactions, amounts payable to a swap counterparty are factored into cash flows and take priority over amounts payable to investors, except for unexpected swap termination payments where the termination was caused by a default or the bankruptcy of the swap counterparty. Without this subordination mechanism, also known as a "flip clause":

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from