Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 12 DECEMBER 2024

When A Gift Is Not A Gift—Resulting Trusts In Real Estate

Bennett Jones LLP
Bennett Jones LLP
Contributor
Bennett Jones LLP

Bennett Jones LLP

Bennett Jones is one of Canada’s premier business law firms. With deep experience in complex...

View firm profile
Explore more from Bennett Jones LLP

When it comes to estate planning, joint tenancy is often seen as a simple way to transfer property after death while bypassing probate fees. But as the case of Jackson v Rosenberg shows, what may seem like.

CanadaReal Estate and Construction

When it comes to estate planning, joint tenancy is often seen as a simple way to transfer property after death while bypassing probate fees. But as the case of Jackson v Rosenberg shows, what may seem like a straightforward solution can lead to unexpected legal disputes. When Nigel Jackson added Lori Rosenberg as a joint tenant of his home, he intended to secure her inheritance through the right of survivorship (a hallmark of joint tenancy). However, when a change of heart led Jackson to sever the joint tenancy, the move sparked a legal battle over the true meaning of a "gift" in property law and whether Rosenberg had an interest in the home beyond the right of survivorship. Here's what unfolded and what it means for future property owners.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from