Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 29 JUNE 2022

Using Lien Bonds On Crown Lands – Is There A Difference?

Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
Contributor
Borden Ladner Gervais LLP

Borden Ladner Gervais LLP

With over 750 lawyers, intellectual property agents and other professionals, BLG services...

View firm profile
Explore more from Borden Ladner Gervais LLP

"Ensuring payment of contractors and subcontractors and encouraging liquidity in the flow of funds to them are both significant preoccupations in the construction industry."

CanadaReal Estate and Construction

"Ensuring payment of contractors and subcontractors and encouraging liquidity in the flow of funds to them are both significant preoccupations in the construction industry." The opening sentence of the 2015 Supreme Court of Canada decision in Stuart Olson Dominion Construction Ltd. v. Structal Heavy Steel 2015 SCC 43 (Stuart Olson) succinctly and effectively sets out what is, in practice, a more nuanced "preoccupation" than it may seem.

One of the primary disruptors of liquidity and the flow of funds on a construction project is the registration of a lien. The effectiveness of the construction lien is precisely because of its impact on the flow of funds on a construction project. Typically, under provincial lien legislation, an owner is required to withhold a certain percentage from payments (commonly referred to as holdback) to a contractor, which varies from province to province (for example, in Ontario it is 10 per cent, while in Manitoba it is 7.5 per cent).

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from