Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 10 MARCH 2026

No Permit, Big Problems: Building Code Compliance, Implied Terms And Vendor-Builder Liability In Ontario

Bennett Jones LLP
Bennett Jones LLP
Contributor
Bennett Jones LLP

Bennett Jones LLP

Bennett Jones is one of Canada’s premier business law firms. With deep experience in complex...

View firm profile
Explore more from Bennett Jones LLP

In Oliva v. Dickson (2025 ONSC 6666), the Ontario Superior Court of Justice delivered a decision that should capture the attention of developers, vendor-builders and anyone selling improved property in Ontario.

CanadaReal Estate and Construction

In Oliva v. Dickson (2025 ONSC 6666), the Ontario Superior Court of Justice delivered a decision that should capture the attention of developers, vendor-builders and anyone selling improved property in Ontario. The case is a pointed reminder that Building Code compliance is not merely regulatory housekeeping. It can become both an implied contractual obligation and the foundation for tort liability years after closing.

The Facts (and Why This Wasn't a Typical Transaction)

The defendant vendors purchased a property in Hamilton Township and undertook significant renovations before selling it to the plaintiffs. The work included raising the house by four to six feet (a major structural alteration designed to enlarge the basement), installing a new septic system and constructing a garage. A building permit was obtained for the garage. No permit was obtained for raising the house or for the installation of the new septic system and the garage permit did not cover the

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from