Log in or register
Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 15 AUGUST 2023

Contributions To Multi-Generational Home Does Not Constitute Unjust Enrichment (Sidhu v. Sidhu)

Gardiner Roberts LLP
Gardiner Roberts LLP
Contributor
Explore more from Gardiner Roberts LLP

A growing trend in home use is multi-generational housing, which is, as the term implies, multiple generations of a family living together within the same home.

CanadaReal Estate and Construction
Isabel Yoo
Isabel Yoo
Author LinkedIn connections

A growing trend in home use is multi-generational housing, which is, as the term implies, multiple generations of a family living together within the same home. An example is where aging parents live with their adult children and their grandchildren. When the various generations of the family contribute towards the living expenses of the shared home, it is important to consider the legal and financial implications.

In Sidhu v. Sidhu, 2023 ONSC 4618, the Superior Court of Ontario was asked to consider the remedy of unjust enrichment applicable to a multi-generational family living together in a shared residence and pooling funds to meet their housing costs. The applicant was the matriarch of the family, and the respondents were her eldest son and her daughter-in-law. The respondents ran a real estate company together, which they operated out of the den of the shared property.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

Register for freeORLog in

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

View source

Related Articles

Legal Intelligence Newsletters: sign up for the latest legal and regulatory news on your chosen topics

Read more about

Related Comparative Guides

See more popular content from

Article

Ontario’s Mandatory Annual Holdback Release Starts In 2027: What Owners And Contractors Need To Know

Starting in 2027, all Ontario project owners with contracts entered into on or after January 1, 2026, and most owners with contracts dating back to July 1, 2018, must start releasing statutory holdback to their contractors on an annual basis. This requirement is the latest in a series of construction payment reforms under Ontario’s Construction Act. It replaces the traditional model of retaining holdback until substantial performance. Owners and contractors who fail to comply with the notice and payment timelines face exposure to interest claims, payment disputes, and adjudication proceedings.
CanadaReal Estate and Construction
Miller Thomson
Miller Thomson
Article

Holdback Deficiencies And Mortgage Priority: Court Of Appeal For Ontario Clarifies S. 78(2) Of The Construction Act

The Court of Appeal for Ontario has resolved a critical uncertainty in construction law regarding how holdback deficiencies should be calculated when owners fail to retain statutory holdbacks. The decision addresses whether contractors who have already been paid can claim additional priority over construction mortgages, and establishes important boundaries to prevent double recovery while balancing the interests of all parties in the construction pyramid.
CanadaReal Estate and Construction
Aird & Berlis LLP
Aird & Berlis LLP
Article

Honest Belief No Defence To Defamatory Tweet About MP (Maggi v. Smith)

A recent Ontario court decision examines whether sincere belief in serious allegations can protect speakers from defamation liability when making accusations about public figures on social media. The case arose from posts alleging that a lawyer and Member of Parliament intimidated voters during a political nomination contest, raising important questions about the balance between free expression and reputation protection in political discourse.
CanadaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Gardiner Roberts LLP
Gardiner Roberts LLP
Article

Plaintiffs Awarded A Total Of $800,000 In Damages For Defamation (Murdy v. Barrette)

A Canadian court awarded $800,000 in damages to a couple defamed by serious false allegations of sexual assault and criminal misconduct spread through social media. The case examines how factors like the severity of accusations, use of social media platforms, and a defendant's failure to mount a defense can dramatically escalate defamation damages beyond typical awards.
CanadaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
Gardiner Roberts LLP
Gardiner Roberts LLP
Article

No Charter Right To Bicycle Lanes (Cycle Toronto v. Ontario (Attorney General))

The Ontario Court of Appeal has overturned a lower court ruling that found the provincial government's legislation to remove bicycle lanes from major Toronto streets unconstitutional. The decision addresses fundamental questions about the separation of powers between courts and legislatures, and whether the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms creates positive obligations for governments to maintain infrastructure like bicycle lanes.
CanadaGovernment, Public Sector
Gardiner Roberts LLP
Gardiner Roberts LLP
Article

Lights, Camera Infractions: A Review Of Ontario’s Automatic Enforcement System Offence Regime, The Risks To Commercial Vehicle Carriers And How Operators Can Protect Themselves

Ontario's automatic enforcement system (AES) offences, captured by red light cameras and similar technology, pose significant regulatory risks to commercial vehicle carriers. These offences carry the maximum 5 CVOR penalty points—equivalent to impaired driving or criminal negligence—yet are nearly impossible to defend or resolve through plea negotiations.
CanadaTransport
Gardiner Roberts LLP
Gardiner Roberts LLP
Article

Lawyer Receives 6-Month Suspension For Misuse Of Artificial Intelligence (Law Society Of Ontario v. Lee)

The misuse of artificial intelligence by litigants and lawyers continues to be alarming. Although it is well-documented that generative artificial intelligence platforms have a tendency to produce inaccurate answers to legal questions, and, moreover, to produce output which references non-existing cases or which inaccurately portrays legal propositions in existing cases, these tools continue to be used recklessly.
CanadaCriminal Law
Gardiner Roberts LLP
Gardiner Roberts LLP