Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 25 NOVEMBER 2014

Complying With Notice Provisions

This case deals with a sale of land for property tax arrears.

CanadaReal Estate and Construction

Cwalina Estate v. Parkland (County), 2013 ABCA 343 (Alberta Court of Appeal)

This case deals with a sale of land for property tax arrears.  It discusses issues with notice that have potential application to the professional regulatory context. The plaintiffs sued Parkland County for selling land in which they had a registered interest.  The plaintiffs hadn't received notice of the arrears and sale. The plaintiffs had corresponded with Parkland County using their current addresses, but had stopped updating their address with the Land Titles Office many years prior. As a result, notices sent to the address in the records of the Land Titles Office bounced back.

Parkland County argued that they had provided notice in accordance with their statute, the Municipal Government Act, which required that "notice must be sent to the address shown in the records of the Land Titles Office." Both the Trial Court and the Court of Appeal agreed and found for the County. The Court

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from