Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 24 JANUARY 2025

Clear As Mud: Analyzing Voluntary Property Control Removals So Far

McMillan LLP
McMillan LLP
Contributor
McMillan LLP

McMillan LLP

The firm : McMillan LLP is one of Canada’s leading national law firms with offices in Montreal,...

View firm profile
Explore more from McMillan LLP

The Competition Bureau recently announced that Empire (the parent company of IGA, Sobeys, etc.), agreed to remove an exclusive/restrictive covenant in favour of the IGA...

CanadaReal Estate and Construction

The Competition Bureau recently announced that Empire (the parent company of IGA, Sobeys, etc.), agreed to remove an exclusive/restrictive covenant in favour of the IGA (and only grocery store) in Crowsnest Pass, Alberta, that apparently prevented other grocery stores from entering the market,1 after an "investigation" by the Bureau.

As discussed in the questions below, this announcement may actually bring less clarity for landlords and tenants seeking to understand when and how alleged these types of restrictions will be enforced. Crowsnest Pass is home to about 6,000 people, so this action seems like very low-hanging fruit for the Bureau's first publicly announced attempt at reining in "property controls". The grocery industry and retailers more generally have not yet developed a consistent position on potential enforcement of "property controls". As of November 2024, Walmart has "unilaterally waive[d] retail restrictions",2 Loblaw's CEO indicated a desire to

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The foregoing provides only an overview and does not constitute legal advice. Readers are cautioned against making any decisions based on this material alone. Rather, specific legal advice should be obtained.

© McMillan LLP 2025

See more popular content from