Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 30 JULY 2015

You Won Your Case — Now What? SCC To Consider Intersection Of Judgment Enforcement And Privacy Rights

Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP
Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP
Contributor
Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

As one of Canada’s top business law firms, Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP (Blakes) provides...

View firm profile
Explore more from Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

A plaintiff wins judgment, but the defendant (judgment debtor) refuses to pay or provide information necessary for the plaintiff (judgment creditor) to realize against the debtor's assets.

CanadaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

A plaintiff wins judgment, but the defendant (judgment debtor) refuses to pay or provide information necessary for the plaintiff (judgment creditor) to realize against the debtor's assets. When and how can the creditor obtain that necessary information from a third party?

This is the question at the heart of Royal Bank of Canada v. Trang, a case that the Supreme Court of Canada (SCC) has just agreed to hear. In this appeal, the SCC will have to balance the right of creditors to substantive access to justice — receiving the money that was awarded to them — against the right of debtors to privacy — having third parties protect their personal information, even from legitimate judgment creditors.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from