Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 09 JUNE 2026

When Settling Out Isn’t Enough: Contribution Claims After Pre-Con Builders Ltd V Neil Cooper Architect Inc

The Manitoba Court of Appeal has reaffirmed that defendants in multi-party litigation retain statutory rights to pursue contribution claims against settling co-defendants, even when they haven't raised all available defenses.

CanadaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

A release alone may not provide finality in multi-party litigation. In Pre-Con Builders Ltd v Neil Cooper Architect Inc, the Manitoba Court of Appeal confirmed that settling defendants may still face contribution claims, highlighting important considerations when structuring settlements.

When Settling Out Isn't Enough: Contribution Claims After Pre-Con Builders Ltd v Neil Cooper Architect Inc, 2026 MBCA 20

If you settle a client out of multi-party litigation with nothing more than a release, you may not have walked away at all.

That is the lesson from Pre-Con Builders Ltd v Neil Cooper Architect Inc, 2026 MBCA 20. The Court of Appeal restored a third-party claim that had been summarily dismissed below and in doing so reaffirmed three points: (1) the right to contribution under The Tortfeasors and Contributory Negligence Act (the "Act") is a statutory cause of action with its own rules; (2) a defendant need not raise every available defence to the main action before claiming over;

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from