Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 12 JUNE 2023

Unusable Discovery: BC Court Of Appeal Upholds Implied Undertaking In Engineering Complain

A recent decision from the BC Court of Appeal in Association of Professional Engineers and Geoscientists of the Province of British Columbia v. Engineer X, 2023 BCCA 211 upheld a BC Supreme Court decision...

CanadaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

A recent decision from the BC Court of Appeal in Association of Professional Engineers and Geoscientists of the Province of British Columbia v. Engineer X, 2023 BCCA 211 upheld a BC Supreme Court decision that refused to grant the Association of Professional Engineers and Geoscientists of BC ("EGBC") leave to use pre-trial discovery evidence, gathered as part of a civil action, to investigate a complaint against three of its members. EGBC is the regulatory body responsible for the regulation of the engineering and geoscience professions in BC.

What Happened?

In February 2016, a man in his early twenties fell from an exterior fire escape, resulting in catastrophic injuries. He commenced a civil action in December 2016 alleging that his fall was due to the state of disrepair of the fire escape and named an engineering company, among others, as a defendant.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from