Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 02 OCTOBER 2023

The Importance Of Precise Settlement Agreements In Class Actions: McLean v. Canada (Attorney General)

McCarthy Tétrault
McCarthy Tétrault
Contributor
McCarthy Tétrault

McCarthy Tétrault

Built on a unique model of collaboration, innovation and efficiency, McCarthy Tétrault delivers...

View firm profile
Explore more from McCarthy Tétrault

In McLean v Canada (Attorney General), 2023 FC 1093, the Federal Court refused to extend the deadline for survivors of Indian Day Schools to file claims for compensation under a class action settlement agreement.

CanadaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

In McLean v Canada (Attorney General), 2023 FC 1093, the Federal Court refused to extend the deadline for survivors of Indian Day Schools to file claims for compensation under a class action settlement agreement. McLean emphasizes the importance of clear and specific settlement terms, as the Court's supervisory jurisdiction cannot be used as a tool to modify settlements. Rather, Courts can only intervene in exceptional circumstances, such as where a settlement agreement has not been properly implemented.

Background

In 2018, the Federal Court certified a class proceeding on behalf of "all persons... who attended an Indian Day School" as well the survivor's family members. Canada and representatives of the survivors entered into a settlement agreement. In 2019, the Federal Court approved the settlement. Under the settlement agreement, class members had until July 13, 2022 to claim compensation. Individual claimants could request an extension for special reasons

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from