Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 14 MAY 2014

SCC: Wide Swath Of Public Servants’ Records Can Be Shielded From Disclosure

Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP
Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP
Contributor
Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

As one of Canada’s top business law firms, Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP (Blakes) provides...

View firm profile
Explore more from Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

The Supreme Court of Canada found that the "advice or recommendations" exemption in Ontario’s FIPPA should be broadly interpreted.

CanadaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

In a unanimous ruling in John Doe v. Ontario (Finance), the Supreme Court of Canada found that the "advice or recommendations" exemption in Ontario's Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act (FIPPA) should be broadly interpreted. The Supreme Court's ruling will limit the circumstances in which requesters will be able to access government records.

This case concerned records which were sought under FIPPA by an anonymous requester. The records, which related to the provincial government's decision to amend Ontario's corporate tax law retroactively, were created by public servants in the Ministry of Finance.

FIPPA provides a broad right of access to government information. FIPPA also provides for certain limited and specific exemptions to that broad right of access. These include a discretionary exemption relating to records that "would reveal advice or recommendations of a public servant." The Minister of Finance refused to disclose the records at issue

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from