Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 06 OCTOBER 2015

Pederson V. Saskatchewan: Fresh Evidence Not Permitted In Application For Leave To Appeal

In an appeal before the Saskatchewan Court of Appeal, can a prospective appellant introduce fresh evidence in support of an application for leave to appeal?

CanadaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

In an appeal before the Saskatchewan Court of Appeal, can a prospective appellant introduce fresh evidence in support of an application for leave to appeal? In Pederson v. Saskatchewan (Minister of Social Services), 2015 SKCA 87, the Court concluded that it lacked jurisdiction to consider fresh evidence on an application for leave to appeal.

In Pederson, the prospective appellants sought leave to appeal the Queen's Bench Chambers judge's decision denying certification of a proposed class action on behalf of foster children that had suffered a personal injury while a ward of the Province of Saskatchewan. In support of their application for leave, the prospective appellants sought to introduce as fresh evidence an affidavit sworn by a class member seeking to act as a representative plaintiff in the action.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from