Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 22 MAY 2026

Partial Summary Judgment Remains Exceptional: Lessons From Kotsopoulos v. Toronto

Dickinson Wright PLLC
Dickinson Wright PLLC
Contributor
Dickinson Wright PLLC

Dickinson Wright PLLC

Dickinson Wright is a full-service law firm with more than 550 lawyers, serving clients across the...

View firm profile
Explore more from Dickinson Wright PLLC

Typically, motions for partial summary judgment are difficult to advance and, in many cases, do not proceed to scheduling given their low likelihood of success. However, Kotsopoulos v. Toronto (City)...

CanadaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

A recent decision from Ontario’s highest court has yielded an unusual result regarding Ontario’s ever-evolving summary judgment regime.

Typically, motions for partial summary judgment are difficult to advance and, in many cases, do not proceed to scheduling given their low likelihood of success. However, Kotsopoulos v. Toronto (City), 2026 ONCA 121 (“Kotsopoulos”) raised an unusual procedural question: what happens when a motion that ought not to have been scheduled nevertheless proceeds to be heard?

In Kotsopoulos, the action arose from an incident in which a plaintiff fractured her ankle after stepping into a hole located within a ditch in a municipal road allowance in Toronto. The plaintiff commenced an action against the City of Toronto (the “City”), alleging negligence in the maintenance of the area.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from