Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 17 JULY 2012

On-Risk E-Bulletin @ Gowlings - July 13, 2012 - Volume 10, Number 3

Gowling WLG
Gowling WLG
Contributor
Gowling WLG

Gowling WLG

The firm The firm’s lawyers speak English, French, Russian and Ukrainian. The firm’s client base...

View firm profile
Explore more from Gowling WLG

When seeking to recover damages in connection with harm resulting from another’s negligence, an injured party must establish on a balance of probabilities that the tortfeasor caused the injury in question.

CanadaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Edited by Paul J. Stein and Heather Gray

The Supreme Court takes another stab at the application of the "material contribution" test: Clements v. Clements and the law of proof of causation in negligence

By: Julia Vizzaccaro and Belinda Bain

Introduction

When seeking to recover damages in connection with harm resulting from another's negligence, an injured party must establish on a balance of probabilities that the tortfeasor caused the injury in question. The requirement that an injured party establish a causal connection between the negligent act and the resulting harm has been recognized to anchor the law of negligence to one of its underlying purposes, that of corrective justice.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from