Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 07 APRIL 2009

Fraud And Freezing Orders - Obligations Of Banks In Dealing With Client Accounts

Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP
Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP
Contributor
Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

As one of Canada’s top business law firms, Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP (Blakes) provides...

View firm profile
Explore more from Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

In this bulletin, we address certain situations in which a bank may, or must, deal with a client's account without the client's consent.

CanadaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Copyright 2009, Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

Originally published in Blakes Bulletin on Litigation/Financial Services, April 2009

In this bulletin, we address certain situations in which a bank may, or must, deal with a client's account without the client's consent. On April 2, 2009, the Supreme Court of Canada (SCC) released its decision in BMP Global Distribution Inc. v. Bank of Nova Scotia, 2009 SCC 15 (BMP). In BMP, the SCC clarified banks' legal obligations in dealing with client accounts, and banks' duties to their clients and other banks in circumstances of fraud. The BMP decision is consistent with other recent decisions addressing banks' duties and obligations when served with freezing and garnishing orders.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from