Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 04 JULY 2025

Federally Regulated Industries: The SCC Reaffirms And Clarifies The Interjurisdictional Immunity Doctrine

Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
Contributor
Borden Ladner Gervais LLP

Borden Ladner Gervais LLP

With over 750 lawyers, intellectual property agents and other professionals, BLG services...

View firm profile
Explore more from Borden Ladner Gervais LLP

The Supreme Court of Canada (SCC) recently rendered a unanimous and consequential judgment in Opsis Airport Services Inc. v. Québec (Attorney General)1 that refined the doctrine of interjurisdictional...

CanadaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

The Supreme Court of Canada (SCC) recently rendered a unanimous and consequential judgment in Opsis Airport Services Inc. v. Québec (Attorney General)1 that refined the doctrine of interjurisdictional immunity (IJI) while confirming its continued relevance in protecting core federal legislative powers. This decision holds important lessons for federally regulated entities, in areas like aeronautics and interprovincial or international transportation, that seek to determine whether provincial regulatory regimes apply to them.

BLG acted for an intervener in this significant appeal on the constitutional division of powers.

Background

Opsis Airport Services Inc. (Opsis), a federally regulated enterprise, provides airport security services at aerodromes across Canada. After being charged for failing to obtain a permit under the Québec's Private Security Act (PSA),2 it challenged the applicability of the legislative scheme by relying on IJI,3 arguing that the PSA

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from