Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 12 SEPTEMBER 2012

Facebook App: Dispute Resolution Terms Upheld

In a Facebook app called "SuperPoke! Pets", players adopted virtual pets and acquired or purchased virtual currency to buy things for their virtual pets.

CanadaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

In a Facebook app called "SuperPoke! Pets", players adopted virtual pets and acquired or purchased virtual currency to buy things for their virtual pets. As one of the first Facebook apps, the game took off in popularity after its launch in 2008. The game was acquired by Google in 2010, but was eventually discontinued at the end of 2011, leaving users without access to their accumulated virtual pets, currency and pet accessories. Users attempted a class-action suit against Google for "elimination of users' money, goods and property."

Google defended the class action by citing the dispute resolution clause, which compelled arbitration. In Abreu v. Slide, Inc., 12 0042 WHA (N.D. Cal.; July 12, 2012), the court confirmed that for an arbitration clause to be unenforceable, it must be both "procedurally" and "substantively" unconscionable. Essentially this means that an unenforceable clause would be oppressive due to unequal bargaining power between the parties, or would

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from