Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 06 FEBRUARY 2025

Get Out Of The Way! The Agony Of Split-Second Decision Making

When faced with sudden emergencies, drivers may be held to a lower standard of care under the Agony Doctrine. A case out of the Ontario Court of Appeal ruled that a driver with only seconds...

CanadaInsurance

When faced with sudden emergencies, drivers may be held to a lower standard of care under the Agony Doctrine. A case out of the Ontario Court of Appeal ruled that a driver with only seconds to react was not liable for his evasive actions. Despite having about five seconds, his choices were deemed reasonable given the circumstances. The case underscores how courts assess liability based on context, including speed and reaction time. While often raised in accident claims, the Agony Doctrine rarely applies unless the emergency is truly unforeseeable.

Drivers faced with suddenly hazardous situations must make split-second, adrenaline-fuelled, and potentially life-altering decisions to protect themselves and their passengers. When accidents occur, the driver who created the hazard is generally liable. However, the driver who must avoid the hazard may also be partially liable, depending on the evasive manoeuvres they took.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from