Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 26 JUNE 2018

Divided Supreme Court Suggests Standard Of Review Framework Is Unsettled

•The Supreme Court of Canada's (SCC) split decision in Canada v. Canada, issued June 14, 2018, indicates the SCC is not yet done refining the standard of review analysis enunciated in Dunsmuir

CanadaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

The Supreme Court of Canada's (SCC) split decision in Canada (Canadian Human Rights Commission) v. Canada (Attorney General) (the Decision), issued June 14, 2018, is the latest indication that the SCC is not yet done refining the standard of review analysis enunciated in Dunsmuir. While the SCC was unanimous in result, the majority and two concurring opinions applied different standards based on diverging views on the framework for assessing standard of review. This Decision may be a precursor to the SCC's further anticipated development of the law arising from appeals tentatively scheduled to be heard in December 2018.

Background

The Decision arose out of two Canadian Human Rights Tribunal (Tribunal) decisions that found that legislative entitlements to registration under the Indian Act did not fall within the definition of a "service" under the Canadian Human Rights Act. On judicial review, the Federal Court and the Federal Court of Appeal upheld the Tribunal

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from