Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 04 NOVEMBER 2026

Selling A Business? Your Indemnity Clause Probably Doesn’t Transfer Pre-closing Negligence

Miller Thomson
Miller Thomson
Contributor

Miller Thomson

Miller Thomson LLP ("Miller Thomson") is a national business law firm with approximately 500...

View firm profile
Explore more from Miller Thomson

When an engineering firm sold its assets through an asset purchase agreement with a broad indemnity clause, it later discovered the buyer would not cover pre-closing negligence claims. The Alberta Court of Appeal's decision in Strongco Corporation v Nordstrong Equipment Limited clarifies that general indemnity language does not transfer liability for a party's own negligence unless the contract makes that intention unmistakably clear...

CanadaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

An engineering firm sold its assets through an asset purchase agreement that included a broad indemnity clause. Years later, when a grain elevator it had negligently designed before closing was found to be defective, the seller settled the claim and sought to recover from the buyer under the indemnity.

In Strongco Corporation v Nordstrong Equipment Limited, 1 the Alberta Court of Appeal (the “Court”) held that broad indemnity language does not transfer liability for a party’s own pre-closing negligence, unless the contract makes that intention unmistakably clear.

The decision reinforces a principle with direct implications for anyone drafting or relying on indemnity clauses in asset purchase agreements.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from