Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 06 APRIL 2022

Court Considers Test For Consolidation Of Actions

In Paterson v. Gilbert, 2021 ONSC 8469, the plaintiff, Steven Paterson, brought a motion to consolidate three purportedly related actions.

CanadaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

In Paterson v. Gilbert, 2021 ONSC 8469, the plaintiff, Steven Paterson, brought a motion to consolidate three purportedly related actions. Justice Marvin Kurz granted the plaintiff's motion in part.

Overview

The three actions that the plaintiff sought to consolidate were:

The "MVA Action", Stuart v. Paterson, Intact Insurance Company and Western Assurance Company, wherein the Stuarts sued Steven Paterson for damages arising out of a motor vehicle accident of November 3, 2016. Mr. Paterson ran and red light and collided with the Stuarts' vehicle.

The "LTD Action", Stuart v. Blue Cross Insurance Company of Canada, wherein Stephen Stuart sued his long-term disability insurer claiming entitlement to ongoing LTD benefits, which were terminated effective August 31, 2019.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from