Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 02 APRIL 2025

Claim For Ineffective Assistance Of Counsel Dismissed As A Collateral Attack (Mann v. Royle)

Gardiner Roberts LLP
Gardiner Roberts LLP
Contributor
Explore more from Gardiner Roberts LLP

In some cases, the doctrines of collateral attack and abuse of process may be invoked to strike a claim where a plaintiff has failed to pursue remedies...

CanadaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

In some cases, the doctrines of collateral attack and abuse of process may be invoked to strike a claim where a plaintiff has failed to pursue remedies, such as an appeal, which were available in earlier proceedings. In Mann v. Royle, 2025 ONSC 1773, the Ontario Superior Court of Justice considered whether a claim against the plaintiff's former criminal lawyers could be struck on this basis.

In 2018, the plaintiff was arrested in the United States for benefits fraud. In about February 2020, after serving time in custody, he was extradited to Canada.

Upon his return to Canada, the plaintiff was charged with taking and concealing a child in contravention of a custody order contrary to section 282(1) of the Criminal Code. The charges alleged that in June 1987, the plaintiff disappeared with his 21-month-old son, taking the child to the United States, despite being required to return him to his ex-wife.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from