Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 25 MAY 2018

Armstrong v. Royal Victoria Hospital, 2018 ONSC 2439

Charles E. Gluckstein of Gluckstein Personal Injury Lawyers and Ryan Breedon successfully represented the Plaintiff in a medical malpractice case. The Plaintiff suffered a thermal injury...

CanadaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Charles E. Gluckstein of Gluckstein Personal Injury Lawyers and Ryan Breedon successfully represented the Plaintiff in a medical malpractice case. The Plaintiff suffered a thermal injury to her ureter during a laparoscopic colectomy. The injury caused her to lose a kidney.

Introduction

This decision by the Honourable Mr. Justice Mulligan provides important guidance on the standard of care when using energy-emitting medical devices, such as the LigaSure device, during laparoscopic surgeries. 

Facts

The Defendant, a general surgeon, was responsible for the colectomy portion of a proctocolectomy (surgical removal of the rectum and colon). The procedure was done laparoscopically (minimally invasive) using a LigaSure device. This device uses heat to cut and seal tissue during surgery.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from