Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 06 SEPTEMBER 2016

Access Denied: Primary Market Liability Regime Not Available To Secondary Market Security Holders

Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP
Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP
Contributor
Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

As one of Canada’s top business law firms, Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP (Blakes) provides...

View firm profile
Explore more from Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

In its recent decision in Rooney v. ArcelorMittal S.A. (Rooney), the Court of Appeal for Ontario held that primary market investors have the option of suing both the offeror and its directors and signatories...

CanadaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

In its recent decision in Rooney v. ArcelorMittal S.A. (Rooney), the Court of Appeal for Ontario (Court) held that primary market investors have the option of suing both the offeror and its directors and signatories for misrepresentations in a circular pursuant to section 131(1) (within Part XXIII) of the Ontario Securities Act (Act). However, secondary market investors must bring their claims under the secondary market liability regime in Part XXIII.1 of the Act, which includes more onerous requirements expressly created for secondary market claims.

BACKGROUND

Rooney is a class action brought by security holders of Baffinland Iron Mines Corporation (Baffinland) against Baffinland and others involved in a hostile take-over bid for Baffinland. The plaintiffs allege that the take-over bid circulars prepared by the defendants omitted material information and made material misrepresentations about Baffinland's business and affairs. The representative plaintiffs

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from