Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 20 APRIL 2022

A Duty Of Care To A Non-Existent Person?

Proving that a doctor owes a duty of care to their patient is a fundamental part of a medical malpractice case. Where there is no duty of care, there can be no liability for damages.

CanadaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Proving that a doctor owes a duty of care to their patient is a fundamental part of a medical malpractice case. Where there is no duty of care, there can be no liability for damages.

Establishing that a doctor who is providing medical treatment to their patient has a duty of care to that person seems deceptively simple. But what about a future patient who does not yet exist?

A recent case before the Ontario Court of Appeal has prompted much discussion and debate over whether a fertility doctor owes a duty of care to both the person being treated as as well as the future offspring if the fertility treatment causes them injury.

In this blog post, I explore some of the complex legal and ethical issues of this case.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from