Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 09 SEPTEMBER 2025

A Cautionary Tale For Farm Succession Planning: Metske v Metske, 2025 ONCA 418

The Court of Appeal for Ontario's recent decision in Metske v Metske provides an important lesson to farming families and their professional advisors: good intentions and family loyalty...

CanadaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

The Court of Appeal for Ontario's recent decision in Metske v Metske provides an important lesson to farming families and their professional advisors: good intentions and family loyalty, while laudable, are no substitute for clear, enforceable agreements. The decision narrows the scope of proprietary estoppel in the agricultural context and underlines the commercial reality that a succession plan must be both documented and financially achievable.

Factual Background

Martin and Roseanne Metske owned a mixed farming enterprise centred on a 152-acre "home farm" with an associated dairy quota. Their son, Tim, had worked on a different parcel from 2003 to 2011. During those years Martin occasionally told Tim that "the farm will be yours one day," but no terms were ever reduced to writing. After a family falling-out in 2011, Tim left the farm and took employment elsewhere.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from