Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 26 NOVEMBER 2009

US Court Rejects File-Sharer’s Fair Use Defence

McCarthy Tétrault
McCarthy Tétrault
Contributor
McCarthy Tétrault

McCarthy Tétrault

Built on a unique model of collaboration, innovation and efficiency, McCarthy Tétrault delivers...

View firm profile
Explore more from McCarthy Tétrault

In Capital Records v. Tennenbaum, the US District Court for Massachusetts rejected the defendant file-sharer’s defence that his sharing of musical files over a peer-to-peer (P2P) network was a "fair use" that should insulate him from liability under the US Copyright Act.

CanadaIntellectual Property

In Capital Records v. Tennenbaum, the US District Court for Massachusetts rejected the defendant file-sharer's defence that his sharing of musical files over a peer-to-peer (P2P) network was a "fair use" that should insulate him from liability under the US Copyright Act. The Act allows limited "fair use" of copyrighted material without the rights holder's permission.

The defendant had contended that his uploading of more than 800 songs onto a P2P network was fair in light of the statutory criteria requiring courts to consider (a) the purpose and character of the use; (b) the nature of the copyrighted work; (c) the amount and substantiality of the portion taken; and (d) the effect of the use upon the potential market.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from