Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 05 AUGUST 2019

Marketplace Reality And Infringement

A recent decision of the Federal Court emphasizes the need for evidence of actual confusion in an action for infringement.

CanadaIntellectual Property

A recent decision of the Federal Court emphasizes the need for evidence of actual confusion in an action for infringement.

The Facts

Loblaws Inc. (Loblaws) brought an action against Pampered Chef Ltd. and related corporations (Pampered Chef) in the Federal Court for trademark infringement.

Loblaws owns the following registered trademarks:

(a). the word mark PC, registered for use with (1) food and kitchenware products, and (2) the operation of a reward incentive program for points which can be redeemed for various products (the PC Word Mark);

(b). the design mark (see ) registered for use with (1) food and kitchenware products and (2) the following services: cooking school services, application for digital electronic devices and mobile phones for viewing recipes and nutritional information, and operating a reward incentive program for points.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from