Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 16 AUGUST 2010

Limits on Contractual Limits of Liability – Part II

McCarthy Tétrault
McCarthy Tétrault
Contributor
McCarthy Tétrault

McCarthy Tétrault

Built on a unique model of collaboration, innovation and efficiency, McCarthy Tétrault delivers...

View firm profile
Explore more from McCarthy Tétrault

While courts have declined to enforce contractual limitation of liability (LOL) clauses that are ambiguous, unconscionable or contrary to public policy, pre-contractual warranties can also undermine the effectiveness of these clauses.

CanadaIntellectual Property

While courts have declined to enforce contractual limitation of liability (LOL) clauses that are ambiguous, unconscionable or contrary to public policy, pre-contractual warranties can also undermine the effectiveness of these clauses.

In the last edition of the TLQ, we discussed the recent Supreme Court of Canada (SCC) guidance on the important exceptions that come into play to reduce the effectiveness of LOL clauses. The SCC guidance focuses on different aspects of the LOL clause itself, or the behavior of the wrongdoer under the Agreement. These exceptions are important in the context of LOL clauses in technology-related supply agreements, but they are also relevant to any other type of commercial contract that contains an LOL clause.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from