Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 25 SEPTEMBER 2019

Distinctiveness Negated: A Tale Of Two Newspapers

The Supreme Court of Canada has dismissed an application for leave to appeal from the Federal Court of Appeal ("FCA")

CanadaIntellectual Property

The Supreme Court of Canada has dismissed an application for leave to appeal from the Federal Court of Appeal ("FCA") judgment in Sadhu Singh Hamdard Trust v. Navsun Holdings Ltd., 2019 FCA 10 (CanLII), in which the FCA held that the distinctiveness of a trademark had been negated by third party use of the same mark. While it is well-established that the distinctiveness of a trademark may be negated in this way, this case further establishes that distinctiveness will still be negated even if the third party is a later user and infringing. So the mantra "use it or lose it" doesn't quite go far enough – rather, Canadian trademark owners must "use and enforce it, or lose it".

In this case, the Trust had filed an application to register the mark AJIT (the "Mark") for newspapers, and Navsun opposed on grounds that the Mark lacked distinctiveness because Navsun was also using the mark AJIT for newspapers. In determining whether the Mark lacked distinctiveness, the Trademarks

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from