Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 24 MAY 2016

CIALIS® Patent Survives Validity Challenge On Appeal

McCarthy Tétrault
McCarthy Tétrault
Contributor
McCarthy Tétrault

McCarthy Tétrault

Built on a unique model of collaboration, innovation and efficiency, McCarthy Tétrault delivers...

View firm profile
Explore more from McCarthy Tétrault

Last year we wrote about a trilogy of Federal Court decisions relating to Eli Lilly's erectile dysfunction (ED) drug CIALIS® (tadalafil).

CanadaIntellectual Property

Last year we wrote about a trilogy of Federal Court decisions relating to Eli Lilly's erectile dysfunction (ED) drug CIALIS® (tadalafil). While Lilly was successful in obtaining a prohibition order in the first proceeding, its latter two applications were dismissed. Mylan appealed the first order, and the Federal Court of Appeal (FCA) recently released its decision in Mylan Pharmaceuticals ULC v. Eli Lilly Canada Inc., 2016 FCA 119 dismissing Mylan's appeal.

The FCA's decision affirms the view that obviousness and obviousness-type double patenting validity challenges require distinct analyses, and that a patent's disclosure cannot be referenced to vary the scope or ambit of its claims where those claims are unambiguous.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from