Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 31 MARCH 2009

$222,000 Damages Award Nullified In P2P File-Sharing Case

McCarthy Tétrault
McCarthy Tétrault
Contributor
McCarthy Tétrault

McCarthy Tétrault

Built on a unique model of collaboration, innovation and efficiency, McCarthy Tétrault delivers...

View firm profile
Explore more from McCarthy Tétrault

The much-watched proceeding, testing the robustness of copyright in the digital age, has taken yet another twist. In <em>Capital Records Inc.</em> v. <em>Thomas</em>, a federal judge in Minnesota has nullified the jury's $222,000 judgment against a woman who "made available" downloads of copyrighted music in the share folder of her computer via the peer-to-peer (P2P) file-sharing application Kazaa.

CanadaIntellectual Property

The much-watched proceeding, testing the robustness of copyright in the digital age, has taken yet another twist. In Capital Records Inc. v. Thomas, a federal judge in Minnesota has nullified the jury's $222,000 judgment against a woman who "made available" downloads of copyrighted music in the share folder of her computer via the peer-to-peer (P2P) file-sharing application Kazaa. The jury had found that the woman wilfully infringed 24 of the plaintiffs' sound recordings and awarded them $9,250 for each wilful infringement.

On his own motion, US District Court Judge Michael Davis ruled that he had made a manifest error of law in his instructions to the jury. He had told the jurors that "the act of making copyrighted sound recordings available for electronic distribution on a peer-to-peer network, without license from the copyright owners, violates the copyright owners' exclusive right of distribution, regardless of whether actual distribution has been shown" (our

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from